TEST BETWEEN TREATMENT AND BLOCKS Essays - Hypothesis Testing

Target 1 TEST BETWEEN TREATMENT AND BLOCKS Subordinate Variable:observation SourceType III Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig. Rectified Model239892.700a926654.7442.887.023 Intercept424116.3001424116.30045.930.000 blocks137360.867434340.2173.719.020 treatment84800.833184800.8339.184.007 squares * treatment17731.00044432.750.480.750 Error184678.000209233.900 Total848687.00030 Rectified Total424570.70029 a. R Squared = .565 (Adjusted R Squared = .369) We discover there is no noteworthy contrast among squares and medicines since its critical worth 0.750 is more prominent than 0.05 We discover there is a critical distinction between treatments(urgents) since 0.007 huge worth is not exactly the p-estimation of 0.05. Thou we were unable to run the post-hoc test since we had 2 medicines. We discover there is a critical distinction between the blocks(concentration) as its huge worth is 0.02 is not exactly the p-estimation of 0.05 in this manner we run the LSD tests to decide the distinction Post Hoc Tests focus Numerous COMPARISONS perception LSD (I) concentration(J) concentrationMean Difference (I-J)Std. ErrorSig.95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound c1c246.6755.479.410-69.06162.39 c3116.33*55.479.049.61232.06 c4145.50*55.479.01629.77261.23 c5187.83*55.479.00372.11303.56 c2c1-46.6755.479.410-162.3969.06 c369.6755.479.224-46.06185.39 c498.8355.479.090-16.89214.56 c5141.17*55.479.01925.44256.89 c3c1-116.33*55.479.049-232.06-.61 c2-69.6755.479.224-185.3946.06 c429.1755.479.605-86.56144.89 c571.5055.479.212-44.23187.23 c4c1-145.50*55.479.016-261.23-29.77 c2-98.8355.479.090-214.5616.89 c3-29.1755.479.605-144.8986.56 c542.3355.479.454-73.39158.06 c5c1-187.83*55.479.003-303.56-72.11 c2-141.17*55.479.019-256.89-25.44 c3-71.5055.479.212-187.2344.23 c4-42.3355.479.454-158.0673.39 In light of watched implies. The mistake term is Mean Square(Error) = 9233.900. *. The mean distinction is huge at the 0.05 level. NB Those with the critical worth (p-esteem) under 0.05 are fundamentally extraordinary FINDING C1 is unique in relation to C3,C4 and C5 C2 is unique in relation to C5 C3 is unique in relation to C1 C4 is unique in relation to C1 C5 IS unique in relation to C1 and C2 Assessed Marginal Means critical Subordinate Variable:observation urgentMeanStd. Error95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound salt172.06728.443113.805230.328 vinegar65.73328.4437.472123.995 2. fixation Subordinate Variable:observation concentrationMeanStd. Error95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound c1218.16739.230136.335299.999 c2171.50039.23089.668253.332 c3101.83339.23020.001183.665 c472.66739.230-9.165154.499 c530.33339.230-51.499112.165 Target 2 Trial of Between-Subjects Effects Subordinate Variable:observation SourceType III Sum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig. Revised Model232457.500a546491.5005.808.001 Intercept424116.3001424116.30052.983.000 time133719.800266859.9008.353.002 treatment84800.833184800.83310.594.003 time * treatment13936.86726968.433.871.432 Error192113.200248004.717 Total848687.00030 Revised Total424570.70029 a. R Squared = .548 (Adjusted R Squared = .453) We discover there is no centrality distinction among time and treatment since its noteworthiness esteem is 0.432 which is more prominent than 0.05. We discover there is a noteworthy contrast between treatments(urgents) since 0.003 huge worth is not exactly the p-estimation of 0.05. Thou we were unable to run the post-hoc test since we had 2 medicines. We discover there is a noteworthy contrast between time since 0.002 huge worth is not exactly the p-estimation of 0.05. Subsequently we run the post-hoc test to discover the distinction Post Hoc Tests weeks Numerous Comparisons perception LSD (I) weeks(J) weeksMean Difference (I-J)Std. ErrorSig.95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound week 1week 2-114.70*40.012.008-197.28-32.12 week 3-158.30*40.012.001-240.88-75.72 week 2week 1114.70*40.012.00832.12197.28 week 3-43.6040.012.287-126.1838.98 week 3week 1158.30*40.012.00175.72240.88 week 243.6040.012.287-38.98126.18 In light of watched implies. The blunder term is Mean Square(Error) = 8004.717. *. The mean contrast is critical at the 0.05 level. NB Those with the huge worth under 0.05 are fundamentally extraordinary FINDING Week1 is unique in relation to week2 and week3 Week2 is not the same as week1 Week3 is not the same as week1 Evaluated Marginal Means 1. weeks Subordinate Variable:observation weeksMeanStd. Error95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound week 127.90028.293-30.49386.293 week 2142.60028.29384.207200.993 week 3186.20028.293127.807244.593 Additives Subordinate Variable:observation urgentMeanStd. Error95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound salt172.06728.443113.805230.328 vinegar65.73328.4437.472123.995